Should Taxpayers Fund Public Media? The Debate Over NPR and PBS
Yesterday March 26, NPR CEO Katherine Maher and PBS CEO Paula Kerger testified before the House Subcommittee on a hearing called: “Anti-American Airwaves: Holding the Heads of NPR and PBS Accountable,” focused on allegations of partisan bias within public broadcasting and the ongoing debate over federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which received $535 million from Congress for 2025.
The Accusations Against NPR and PBS
Republicans, accused NPR and PBS of left-wing bias, citing examples such as NPR’s initial dismissal of the Hunter Biden laptop story and PBS’s inclusion of a drag queen on a children’s program.
Among those calling for defunding public media, Representative James Comer (R-Ky.) argued that CPB has become a “left-wing echo chamber” that no longer serves the interests of all Americans. Marjorie Taylor Greene took it a step further, stating that NPR and PBS should be entirely defunded and dismantled, as taxpayer money should not be used to fund what she sees as partisan news organizations.
Adding fuel to the fire, Senator John Neely Kennedy criticized public broadcasting, claiming, “We all know what public radio and public TV are like today: They run from slightly communist to very communist.” He argued that taxpayer money should not subsidize any form of media, regardless of political stance. Representative Eric Burlison echoed this sentiment, pointing out that the U.S. is $36 trillion in debt and should not be allocating funds to media organizations.
NPR’s Response and the Challenge of Perceived Bias
During the hearing, NPR’s Maher acknowledged past missteps, including her own 2020 tweets where she called President Trump a “racist” and a “sociopath.” She also admitted that NPR’s lack of coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story was an error. However, Maher maintained that NPR is committed to journalistic integrity and pointed out that accusations of bias should be weighed against the broader contributions public media makes to civic discourse.
Yet, when confronted with the fact that all 87 members of NPR’s editorial board are registered Democrats, Maher conceded that this was “concerning.” This acknowledgment has fueled conservative arguments that public media is not politically neutral.
The Future of Public Broadcasting
Despite the heated exchanges, no immediate funding changes were enacted, as CPB funding is secured through 2027. However, this hearing signals that public media will continue to face intense scrutiny. President Donald Trump has repeatedly called for NPR and PBS to be defunded, stating, “NPR and PBS, 2 horrible and completely biased platforms, should be DEFUNDED by Congress IMMEDIATELY.”
Should Taxpayers Fund the Media?
The fundamental question at the heart of this debate is whether taxpayer money should be used to fund any form of media. Public broadcasting supporters argue that NPR and PBS provide essential educational and cultural programming that would not survive in a purely commercial environment. Detractors, however, see public media as an outdated model in the digital age, where news and entertainment options are abundant and privately funded alternatives exist.
I align with Senator Kennedy’s perspective: the government should not be in the business of funding media. If a news organization cannot sustain itself through voluntary contributions, advertising, or subscriptions, then it may not be providing content that people truly value. Public broadcasting should stand on its own merit, rather than relying on taxpayer dollars.
The future of NPR and PBS may not be decided overnight, but one thing is certain—this debate is far from over.
Previous Politics posts
Leave a Reply